Prevalence of Pulp Polyp, Fluorosis and Malocclusion in a Known Population
Keywords:
Pulp polyp, Fluorosis, Malocclusion, PrevalenceAbstract
Background: This study was conducted to assess the Prevalence of Pulp Polyp, Fluorosis and Malocclusion in a Known Population.
Material and methods: This study comprised of total 100 participants. The subjects were explained about the study procedure and they were asked to give consent. All the subjects gave consent and hence all the subjects had been included in the study. The prevalence of pulp polyp, fluorosis and malocclusion was assessed. The type of malocclusion was also assessed in the subjects who had malocclusion and the findings were tabulated. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
Results: In this study, there were total 100 subjects of which 36 subjects had pulp polyp, 35 subjects had fluorosis and 29 subjects had malocclusion. Out of 29 cases of malocclusion, 3 cases were of type I malocclusion, 19 cases were of type II malocclusion and 7 cases were of type III malocclusion. There were total 57 males and 43 females in this study, 19 males and 17 females had pulp polyp. 20 males and 15 females had fluorosis. 18 males and 11 females had malocclusion.
Conclusion: From the findings of this study, it can be concluded that the prevalence of pulp polyp, fluorosis and malocclusion was 36%, 35% and 29%, respectively.
Downloads
References
Susheela AK. Fluorosis: Indian scienario : A treatise on fluorosis. New Delhi: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2001. [Google Scholar]
Kotoky P, Barooah PK, Baruah MK, Goswami A, Borah GC, Gogoi HM, et al. Fluoride and endemic fluorosis in the Karbianglong district, Assam, India. Res Rep Fluoride. 2008;41:42–5.
Guidelines for drinking water quality. Geneva: WHO; 2004. World Health Organization.
Prevention and control of fluorosis in India. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission; 1993. Government of India; p. 25.
The World Oral Health Report 2003; Poul Erik Peterson. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. WHO.
Huang J, Gronthos S, Shi S. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Dental Tissues vs. Those from Other Sources: Their Biology and Role in Regenerative Medicine. J Dent Res. 2009;88:792–806.
Miura M, Gronthos S, Zhao M, Lu B, Fisher LW, Robey PG. SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:5807–12.
Seo BM, Miura M, Gronthos S, Bartold PM, Batouli S, Brahim J. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet. 2004;364:149–55.
Thomas M. Orthodontics in the "Art" of Aesthetics. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2015 Winter;26(4):23-8.
Vlachos CC. Occlusal principles in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;39(2):363-78.
Davies SJ, Gray RM, Sandler PJ, O'Brien KD. Orthodontics and occlusion. Br Dent J. 2001 Nov 24;191(10):539-42, 545-9
Kotecha PV, Patel SV, Bhalani KD, Shah D, Shah VS, Mehta KG. Prevalence of dental fluorosis & dental caries in association with high levels of drinking water fluoride content in a district of Gujarat, India. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Jun;135(6):873-7.
Das UM, Venkatsubramanian, Reddy D. Prevalence of malocclusion among school children in bangalore, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;1(1):10-2.
Kumar P, Duraisamy A, Patnana A, Pathak K, Chugh V. Prevalence of Pulp Stones in the Population of Rajasthan: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2024 Jan 3;16(1):e51623.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.