A Comparative Study of Cervical Length Measurement by Ultrasound Versus Digital Examination for Predicting Preterm Labor in Low-Risk Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.8398Keywords:
APH, Maternal outcomes, Fetal outcomesAbstract
Background: Preterm birth remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early identification of women at risk for preterm labor is crucial for timely intervention. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound versus digital examination in predicting preterm labor in a low-risk population.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included 240 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies between 20-24 weeks of gestation without prior history of preterm birth. Cervical length was assessed by both transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination at enrollment and at 28 weeks. Participants were followed until delivery, with preterm birth (delivery before 37 completed weeks) as the primary outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine optimal cut-off values.
Results: The overall preterm birth rate was 8.75% (21/240). The mean cervical length by ultrasound was significantly shorter in women who delivered preterm compared to those who delivered at term (28.3±4.2 mm vs. 36.5±3.9 mm, p<0.001). Digital examination had lower accuracy in estimating cervical length compared to ultrasound (r=0.42, p<0.001). For prediction of preterm birth, a cervical length <30 mm by ultrasound at 20-24 weeks had a sensitivity of 76.2%, specificity of 82.4%, positive predictive value of 29.1%, and negative predictive value of 97.3%. In contrast, digital examination had a sensitivity of 38.1%, specificity of 68.4%, positive predictive value of 10.4%, and negative predictive value of 92.1%.
Conclusion: Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length is superior to digital examination for predicting preterm labor in low-risk women. A cervical length <30 mm at 20-24 weeks gestation can effectively identify women at risk for preterm birth, allowing for closer surveillance and timely interventions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10 Suppl 1:S2.
Sankar MJ, Neogi SB, Sharma J, Chauhan M, Srivastava R, Prabhakar PK, et al. State of newborn health in India. J Perinatol. 2016;36(s3):S3-S8.
Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75-84.
Carlo WA, McDonald SA, Fanaroff AA, Vohr BR, Stoll BJ, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Association of antenatal corticosteroids with mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes among infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. JAMA. 2011;306(21):2348-58.
Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):69-79.
Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(2):214-8.
Sonek JD, Iams JD. Ultrasound in the detection of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(4):858-63.
Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567-72.
Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):311-7.
Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):18-31.
Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, Mazor M, Sorokin Y, Gonçalves L, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(4):956-64.
Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(5):579-87.
Matijevic R, Grgic O, Vasilj O. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(11):1342-7.
Holcomb WL Jr, Smeltzer JS. Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(1):43-5.
Rozenberg P, Gillet A, Ville Y. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):302-11.
Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(3):161-6.
Volumenie JL, Luton D, De Spirlet M, Sibony O, Blot P, Oury JF. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement is not a better predictor of preterm delivery than digital examination in a population of patients with idiopathic preterm labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117(1):33-7.
Berghella V, Owen J, MacPherson C, Yost N, Swain M, Dildy GA 3rd, et al. Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):863-9.
Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O'Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(3):204-10.
Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Michalitsi V, Salambasis K, Chrelias C, Salamalekis G, et al. Cervical length changes from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, and prediction of preterm birth by first-trimester sonographic cervical measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(7):997-1002.
Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):124.e1-19.
Berghella V, Mackeen AD. Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):148-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
